If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Considering the employment of the worker, I am strongly inclined to take the side of an experienced worker. Being one the most proliferated well-known topic in the corporation development and growth, as far as I am concerned, the experience of workers plays a critical role. To elaborate more on the subject mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the main advantage of the experienced worker is the employer has no obligation to train the worker. It is obvious that the first stage of the worker assignment in an appropriate duty is training stages. It is also worth nothing, in addition to the plenty of time that should expense for the training, a lot of investment should also be consumed to hire professional instructors. Thus, it is not on the benefit of the company to investment lots of money for training the workers while there are experienced workers.
Another primary reason can be attribute to the efficiency of the company. As the current appraisal reports reveal, there is causal relationship between the corporation efficiency on the one hand and the the number of experienced workers on the other hand. Therefore, if the employer hire an experienced worker despite the a higher salary, more efficiency such as the economic growth anticipate.
Aside from the point I made above, the main disadvantage of the inexperienced worker can be ascribed to the risk potential of detrimental events. For instance, in an industrial company, there are numerous systems which might accompany harmful effects (i.g. the cutting machines) and working with them need a professional and experienced worker. If inexperienced workers run those systems, in addition to the high troubleshooting, there is a high potential for possible dangers to threaten they health. Therefore, it is more advisable to employ the experienced workers preventing the lots of possible losses.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the main advantages of the experienced workers that categorically outweigh the obvious disadvantages of the inexperienced workers despite the higher salaries. Regarding the company efficiency, training expenses and the harmful potential of inexperienced workers, I put an emphasis that the employer should hire the experienced workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...poration efficiency on the one hand and the the number of experienced workers on the ot...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...poration efficiency on the one hand and the the number of experienced workers on the ot...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...oyer hire an experienced worker despite the a higher salary, more efficiency such as ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40384615385 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16395148492 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6105262678 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.9375 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294920124356 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109780653308 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665523927286 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181583981144 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00993148848345 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.