Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Considering scandals as an useful subject particularly in concentrating the attention on problems in way that no speaker or reformer ever could, I am strongly inclined to take the side of this statement. With respect to the positive role of scandals in controlling the emotional behaviors in frustrated conditions, the capability to enhance the critical management especially in unpredictable situations as well as the promotion of the individual thinking, I believe it can be interpreted as an good opportunity.
Fist and foremost, the scandal provides a condition for all individuals to be powerful in controlling their feelings. It is crystal clear that the first impact of scandal can be recognized as an deteriorated influence on the feeling. As the current psychological findings reveal, the deficiency in perfect handling of the raised emotional from scandals can lead to the unwanted actions which causes the accumulation of problems.
Another primary reasons can be attributed to the positive role of scandals to increase the decision making and enhance the critical managing in unpredictable situations. Being one of most proliferated well-known subject in the management science, the scandals can be marked as the catalyst in aggravating conditions and as a result the ability to reduce they sequential effects are characterized as the state of art subject. For instance, one of the most obligatory courses in the management major and also the related disciplines such as the security and military majors, are passing the critical management. Whereas one of the core subjects in this course is how encounter with scandals effectively, therefore, I exactly feel that the scandal can be pointed out as an useful case.
Aside from the point I made above, the scandal brings about the condition that all individuals promote their thinking ability. As the socialists disclose, there is a causal relationship between the capability to control the crucial conditions derived from the scandals on the one hand and the ability to think and find the innovative solutions on the other hand. Needless to say, this subject can be implied as another advantage of encountering with the scandals.
Although, in some cases the scandals might be addressed as the squandering the time of leader. For instance, if a president encounter some dangerous scandals in addition to they significant duties, they absolutely expense substantial time to demonstrate public media the opposite direction of these scandals. It is obvious that in this situation, I cannot utter that scandals can be referred as useful subject which may be referred as the subject challenging my supporting reasons.
Taking all of these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the positive role of the scandals in focusing our attention on solving the difficult problems. Regarding the importance of emotional handling in facing the scandals, the capability to enhance the critical management of unpredictable situation as well as the promotion of individual thinking in the frustrated conditions, to my best knowledge, I categorically put emphasis on the importance of scandals as an useful topic. Even though some consequential harmful impacts of scandals might result in wasting time and energy of individuals, as far as I am concerned, the advantages noticeably outweigh disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Considering scandals as an useful subject particularly in concentr...
^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ing, I believe it can be interpreted as an good opportunity. Fist and foremost,...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... impact of scandal can be recognized as an deteriorated influence on the feeling. ...
^^
Line 5, column 768, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... that the scandal can be pointed out as an useful case. Aside from the point I ...
^^
Line 11, column 479, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...phasis on the importance of scandals as an useful topic. Even though some conseque...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, in some cases, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2852.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43238095238 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18669342203 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478095238095 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 912.6 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6441932413 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.444444444 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.21951772744 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188971429166 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638348011802 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504520408126 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105224024465 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422982741578 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.