Some people like doing work by hand. Others prefer using machines. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering doing works using hands or machines, I strongly inclined to take the side of doing work by machines. Being one of the most proliferated topics in the industrial revolution, using the machines instead of doing work by hand plays a critical role in societies' development. To elaborate more on the subject mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the accuracy of machines can be denoted as a main advantage for doing work. It goes without saying that development of the computer and consequently the use of machines that equipped with precise programs enhances the quality of work. For example, in some cutting works such as cutting a very thin metal plate with accuracy of 1 millimeter, the laser machines can be used easily. Needless to say, doing such subtle work need a profession person who had lots of experiences in addition to powerful capability.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the noticeable speed of machines in doing a particular work. Regarding the dramatic speed of machines compared with doing work by hand, it is more advisable to use the machines when it comes to quantity. It is also worth noting that doing works is more beneficial in the remarkable quantity.
Aside from the points I made above, considering both time and accuracy, doing work by machines is more cost efficient. For example, regarding an industrial corporation, it is categorically to the benefit of the manager to use the machines considering the substantial cost of the workers such as their salary, they health care costs, insurance, etc. Although, the maintenance cost of the machines can be considerable during the long time operation, as the cost engineering report reveal, there are causal relationship between the economic consideration on the one hand and the substitution of workers by machines on the other hand.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the preference of doing work using machines regarding the accuracy, high speed, and the economic considerations. Although, for some art works, the crucial value of hand-work is considered as a decisive factor, to my best knowledge, for the typical works the main advantages of machines outweigh the disadvantage of doing work by hand.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19137466307 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96559169934 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514824797844 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6558525889 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.4 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7333333333 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298403511998 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121696902767 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724568334278 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197294134157 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766637266779 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.