Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Todays, an increasing of financial in developed countries has given from a development scientific research. The majority people thought that the authorities should be taken apart for funding and controlling instead of private organizations. To some part, I agree with this issue yet it should not control the scientific research itself.
Firstly, a plenty of high-tech appliances have extended well which is invented in developed countries in over 20 years as well as affect the country’s income. The government truly realize, in advanced countries, that they should be responsible for the advanced. Therefore, giving subsidies to the researcher or scientist is likely to give a significant impact. For instance, the number of a company has rocketed incredibly from Chinese’s government as their authority give a funding and some special compensation of policy that could make the firm keep exist in and expanding to abroad as well. Hence, it is quite common the product of China was almost found around the world.
Secondly, the government assumes that the scientific research should be controlled, because of some money given, in order to the research result is not be used by private organizations un-properly. However, this against freedom of thought from the scientist and this issue will arise a new problem that it could be affected to the result’s quality. For example, the number of publication of Indians’ research decline due to restricted policies from Indians’ government. It also impacts directly to their some technology’s product – motorcycle – decreased in Asia-market.
In conclusion, I believe that the government is fully responsible to funding the scientist activities, but it does not have to control every single activity of scientist.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53623188406 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22183561696 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1089291769 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.538461538 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282399357187 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100798808792 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942748748024 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178072537783 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793732543051 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.