Government should not have been to provide care or financial support for elderly people because it is the responsibility of each person to prepare for retirement and support him and her self. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Government jobs are well reputational jobs in our country because it's high paid and also the security is available here. For instance, the topic asserts that should government provide the financial care to the retired people or not? I completely disagree with this opinion because it's responsibility of the government to provide the care amd financial help to reteried people. I will examine the various aspects of the following paragraphs.
To begin with, mostly people are do this job because they know about the features of government jobs after retirement. That's why they choose to do this job. Therefore, the people survive from various critical situations only for the retirement benefits. As well as, some people are do not care about their life and do this job very efficiently and effectively such as; army, police, and commandos. So its the responsibility of government to give the extra benefits to the retired people.
The second one reason of this, the some people own the jobs face some difficulties and got the physical injuries for the whole life time so ik that case it's very important for the government to provide a retirement benefits to the people. In another condition, the people who do government job they pay the tax to the incoms tax department so it's right lf the people to get a financial benefits from the government. Some people was kill on present there jobs so for their family the government should need to provide financial care to them.
In conclusion, there are number of answers of this question. On balance, however, I tend to believe that the one single conclusion that is the responsibility of the only government pay the after retirement benefits to the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...es of government jobs after retirement. Thats why they choose to do this job. Therefo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...t benefits. As well as, some people are do not care about their life and do this j...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...uch as; army, police, and commandos. So its the responsibility of government to giv...
^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... The second one reason of this, the some people own the jobs face some difficult...
^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...got the physical injuries for the whole life time so ik that case its very important for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
... right lf the people to get a financial benefits from the government. Some people was ki...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96515679443 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78892382979 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477351916376 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5649713392 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303256763308 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122113418854 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862801124793 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197714262037 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751319368238 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.