The government should reduce the amount of money spend on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree?
It is often argued that the government should minimize investments in improving the local environment and instead spend money on such crucial problems as global warming and climate change. This essay agrees with that suggestion completely because of benefits it brings to the world and in particular the local environment. This essay will first discuss the effects caused by global warming on the environment and then demonstrates the effects on humans.
Global warming and climate change is the most significant issue that the world is facing today. There are enormous reasons which lead to global warming such as over-farming, industrial activities or fossil fuel emissions, but the amount of the effects on the environment even bigger. This includes, for example, climate variability that leads to habitat destruction. As a result, the world witnesses ecosystem collapses and biodiversity losses which can cause extinction to many species. For example, resent research revealed that continuous temperature changes led to death of a large amount of living creatures in the Artic.
In addition, it is reasonable to notice that global warming and climate change significantly impact on human beings. That is to say the ice melting regularly raises sea level and this leads to flooding or an opposite process - drought of cities and farmland. Such damage has considerable consequences that can cause human migration and conflicts which appeared due to overpopulation of new places for living and/or famine for those who decided to stay on native land. For instance, in May 2020 African officials reported that starvation for many African countries became the new normal due to such natural cataclysm as drought.
In conclusion, this essay supports the idea to increase amount of investments in soling such threatening and urgent issues as global warming and climate change because of damage it causes to the natural environment, to ecosystems and human societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'witnesses'' or 'witness's'?
Suggestion: witnesses'; witness's
...tat destruction. As a result, the world witnesses ecosystem collapses and biodiversity lo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42019543974 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86337867321 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4687616284 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222559007747 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777937238992 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879018488668 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151918741348 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084849648281 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.