The government should sometimes infringe on people's freedom for the security of society.
Agree and disagree
As we all know that liberty is a fundamental right of each individual, thanks to which people have full enjoyment to develop what they desire. Even so, residents also are being impacted by the government's stringent enforcement of regulations. Nevertheless, I support the idea that the government should intervene on it to maintain social safety and prevent potential hazards.
To begin with, the infringement of individuals' liberties erecting a barrier from prospective threats caused by people's behavior is the top priority.
Along with the rise of violence in the status quo, especially from riots, terrorist attacks or jeopardy, thus, the government of intruding on people's liberties is essential to impose. For instance, recently, the government issued an official rule to residents that they can not monitor their own automobiles if they are inebriated, aiming to mitigate the traffic accidents. This is intended to safeguard humans from potentially unsafe situations.
On top of that, the government can violate an individual’s right to freedom in order to make sure the safety regulations are complied. In certain cases, people have to adhere to specific rules to get the expected result and eliminate risks. Take the example of school bus drivers and pilots, to perform their daily work safely, they must be undertaken over courses or training with a lot of tough test rounds to acquire a certification and high quality capacity to run their tasks. This is essential to guarantee that people have not put their lives at peril.
To sum up, the interference of the government on an individual's liberties is inevitable to protect society from threats and make sure that the regulations are obeyed in particular circumstances. For these rationales, bringing more impacts to human’s freedom is occasionally truly significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l safety and prevent potential hazards. To begin with, the infringement of indiv...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om prospective threats caused by peoples behavior is the top priority. Along w...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... peoples behavior is the top priority. Along with the rise of violence in the s...
^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the status quo, especially from riots, terrorist attacks or jeopardy, thus, the...
^^
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y unsafe situations. On top of that, the government can violate an individual...
^^
Line 6, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... certain cases, people have to adhere to specific rules to get the expected resul...
^^
Line 6, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... certification and high quality capacity to run their tasks. This is essential to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, thus, even so, for instance, in particular, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37716262976 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04849592859 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6138023112 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184760462809 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059565994673 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316350837504 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097566339458 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186535880616 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.