Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Some believe that the governments need to spend more money on rails, whereas others say they should spend on roads. In my viewpoint, I agree with the former claim for the following two compelling reasons.
There is a saying, that the government should be responsible for the people, by the people, and to the people. It is the responsibility of the law to look for the well-being of every individual in society. Local authorities should allocate enough funds to appropriate sectors for the wellness of their people in their country. Transportation costs of railways are cheaper when compared to the roads right from the early days. For example, an aesthetic person may not afford high prices for transits in his life. He could only spend a small penny from his savings on travel. So, this could be plausible only when he opts for railways as a mode of transportation. As a result, allocating appropriate collections on facilitating sufficient public amenities such as ticket costs, and hygienic facilities in trains by the local bodies would surely help the middle-class people to save their expenses from their income.
Production and consumption of goods from and to the countries can aid the development of the economy of one's own country. Export and import trades play a predominant role in today's world. A bulk amount of goods and products can be exported and imported only through large containers from the rails. To illustrate this, India is famous for its agriculture and crops. A large quantity of various raw materials can be exported to other countries through railways, while China is rich in making plastic items. Such products will be transported with ease only through tracks. Therefore, this results in enhancing the ideas and culture of different nations.
To recapitulate, as it stands now, several diverse factors can be enhanced among various states in the world by transporting the goods and products through railways and also helpful to all kinds of people in financial terms only when the law allocates appropriate funds to railway systems rather than on-road transport systems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10724637681 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81947796527 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.209380746 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126350155464 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355950592121 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529104752957 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939411877445 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066213845463 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.