Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, as countries develop and due to tremendous growth in population lead to drastically increase in demand on transportation. A vast majority of the people claims that it would be much advantageous if government invest money on developing railways rather than roads. Personally, I completely agree with this view because transportation via trains is much beneficial to environment and could be both time and cost savings for people. In this essay, I am going to support my thoughts by analyzing the merits of evolution of railways.
Let’s begin by looking at effects of transportation on environment. It is noteworthy that nowadays the massive amount of cars has increased in urban cities which produce carbon emissions that contaminate the air. However, it is evident that trains are driven by electricity. So by developing railways and requesting inhabitants to use trains rather than their own cars might reduce the plenty amount of vehicles in ways which can also lead to decrease in carbon emissions to atmosphere. As a result of development in railways, positive effects can be taken by our environment.
Turning to the other side of the issue we can see that as the technology advances in order to be more sophisticated, this evolution also affects trains. Therefore, the fast trains that are recently introduced to people can travel and take inhabitants to their destination points in short time. These fast trains might save the time of people and despite that this transportation might be cheaper than any other which leads to cost savings as well.
All things considered, one of the efficient methods of transportation can be clearly seen that is trains. By looking at benefits of the railways as mentioned above, we can clearly claim that governments should immerse in development of this kind of transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, in short, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20469798658 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1031415389 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55033557047 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1361438456 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138124951041 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445585724375 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620380370119 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872164617423 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533894711002 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.