Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
Agree or Disagree?
There is an idea stating that governments have to pay more attention to railways instead of roads by spending more money. I completely disagree with this point of view. I believe that roads are more significant because they are more comfortable and general; therefore, there should be more money spent on them.
On the one hand, there is a big difference between toads and railways, and it is accessibility. In fact, people always have access to roads while railways are not always reachable. For example, there are so many places that people do not have access to railways and subways in Isfahan, which is one of the biggest cities in Iran. Thus, it is crucial to pay more attention to the roads.
On the other hand, the usage of roads is more general than railways. Not only all people can use roads in various ways such as bicycle and private cars, but also public transportation such as buses also use roads to service people. Also, it should be noted that most of the people use roads to reach the railways and subways, and roads are the connection between people and railways. Therefore, the usage of the road is high, and governments should plan to spend more money to keep the road in good quality.
In general, some people believe that governments should spend more money on railways instead of roads. I strongly disagree with this idea. As stated, I think roads are more important because of their comfortability in access and their general usage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, in fact, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81102362205 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51472506403 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476377952756 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.510331896 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2857142857 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222577485913 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913989236415 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984580825878 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15406389981 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657498746904 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.