Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There are different views on how a government should invest on developing public transport where some people believe the road network should be improved and some others believe it’s the railway that need more improvement. While there are pros and cons for both sides I firmly believe improving railways make much more cost effective, faster and convenient transport system to a country than it would by spending money on roads.
Firstly, trains are a mass transit system, if linked correctly, that can transport thousands of passengers from one destination to another in much less time and much less cost per passenger. For instance, the modern high speed trains can operate at speeds over 300 kilometers per hour and can link even far away destinations in a fraction of time compared to travel by road. Secondly, their ability to transport thousands of people in one train makes the cost per passenger also to a much affordable level than traveling by road and much more comfortable. Thirdly, there is no traffic congestion like on roads as the trains go on a schedule and the railway is dedicated to that particular train. Moreover, even in congested cities, railways built underground, makes traveling much easier without any traffic.
In contrast, it is not practical to connect every door by the trains like a road network does. Therefore, importance of developing road network can not be underestimated. Furthermore, It is pertinent to have a good road network that connects every part and every corner of the country to increase the accessibility by vehicles. Furthermore, good road network is also the key to transport goods and people in areas where trains cannot reach dues to its geographical or other constraints.
In conclusion, though there are both advantages and disadvantages in government focusing on developing public transport by investing to develop railways and roads, I believe they must prioritise the mass transport methods like railways which it faster, safer and more cost effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...increase the accessibility by vehicles. Furthermore, good road network is also the key to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21779141104 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88375699814 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6314134879 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874903910393 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337868068179 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044369253067 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664482749974 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583310670214 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.