Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Although, the infrastructure of cities has developed in a way that makes a sophisticated networks of paths inside and outside of the megacities possible, host of critics are on the opinion that Governments should pay utmost attention to roads as they are more popular. I am beginning to think it works the other way and due to some reasons I believe, governments should spend more money on railways.
In the first place, one compelling and convincing reason in favor of my opinion is the environmental disasters that we have been encountering previously. At the age of the new century, fossil fuel cars which are the main source of air pollution is one of our extremely pressing setbacks which needs to be addressed as soon as possible and it is crystal clear that only governments could financially supply this projects. Governments should do some measurements in order to reverse the repercussion of exhaust fumes by replacing some facilities like railways. while by investing money on roads governments are encouraging people to use private cars and as a consequence they are actually compounding the situation of air pollution.
Furthermore, another essential point which bolsters my vantage point about this issue is thanks to advent of technology and cutting edged facilities high technical vehicles like trains transmit people and commodities at a very high rate. Many surveys in metropolitans area have shown that railways like metro diminish the period of journeys up to 50 per cent. It is going without thinking that many people prefer punctual trains rather than getting stuck in traffic. So it is worth spending money on railways.
Therefore, again with regard to the series of circumstances which have polluted the air like personal cars the government should allocate a lot of money to other ways like railways, with specially having more popularity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'network'?
Suggestion: network
...ped in a way that makes a sophisticated networks of paths inside and outside of the mega...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...eplacing some facilities like railways. while by investing money on roads governments...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, so, therefore, while, with regard to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17161716172 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95935645547 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5142200358 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.454545455 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186319743963 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698993164259 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437747806348 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107818476358 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113637941199 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.