People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have always been searchin ways to convey their concepts and of course learn and augment their knowledge efficiently. By growing technologies many new avenues to assist people in this respect but yet there has been an overwhelming weight of obsession as whether people could be taught by their counterparts or their superior. While some are on the belief that teachers are the best instructors, on the otherside of the coin the opposite view has its own proponent. I for one, thinks the second view carries more light. The following reason wil elaborate on the thesis.
The first aspects of the current discussion which demand a keen contemplation is that, people spend a large percentage of their times with their friends and peels so they have a close and cemented relationship with them. to simply stated, this intimacy help them to ask their questions without shame. For example, they could hold their sessions in a friendly environment like their home or at coffee shope. I think as people were more involved and enjoy more they they will learn swiftly. they can have some and interrupt and talk their materials over which provide them with pleasure and if you ask them they will say that thay have a good time.definitely this attitude to learning would facilitate the learning process.
Another equally significant points to be mentioned is that, since their fellows have experienced the same material hitherto in a previous frame of time, they better teach them. To clarify, the same position people, have had the same problems and drawbacks and flaws, so they explictly know how to come over them. Furthermore people are vivid and energitic and also more curious in issues thet they are also involved in them a little sooner to learn others. to shed more light, according to the result of one survey that posted in Newtymes, students have learn far better in the class of young teachers or their teachers assistanst rather than their major professors. thats because teacher assistansts see materials in the glass of students.
Based on the discussion and by takingall of the aformentioned ideas into consideration it can easily uphold that counterpart-steachers are more helpfull becaus
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...se and cemented relationship with them. to simply stated, this intimacy help them ...
^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estions without shame. For example, they could hold their sessions in a friendly ...
^^
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: they
...eople were more involved and enjoy more they they will learn swiftly. they can have some ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...njoy more they they will learn swiftly. they can have some and interrupt and talk t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y will learn swiftly. they can have some and interrupt and talk their materials o...
^^
Line 2, column 724, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would facilitate the learning process. Another equally significant points to be...
^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...y explictly know how to come over them. Furthermore people are vivid and energitic and also...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and energitic and also more curious in issues thet they are also involved in th...
^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...n them a little sooner to learn others. to shed more light, according to the resul...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
... that posted in Newtymes, students have learn far better in the class of young teache...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thats
...nst rather than their major professors. thats because teacher assistansts see materia...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nst rather than their major professors. thats because teacher assistansts see materia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, for example, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05494505495 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75634210666 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585164835165 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5223982228 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137651334774 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464060107591 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033570934173 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746606899006 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431252843798 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.