People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
God created human beings with the tendency to reproduce, so that they may take of their offspring. children, right from a young age imitate the deeds and actions of their parents and teachers, thus being greatly influenced by them. even after attaining maturity, they tend to listen to their parents rather than the peer group. hence, I strongly agree to the fact that people learn things better from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Educational institutions are set up in order to provide the necessary knowledge to the children through teachers. These students are often monitored by the elders and given advises based on the nature of behavior while growing. For example, a child who abuses his friend always is counselled and made right in the initial stages of such a behavior. Otherwise, it could lead to deleterious effects which could prove to be detrimental, both for himself and the society.
Furthermore, teaching inculcates the necessary values needed for life. A student learns many things throughout his life from the teacher, because he spends most of the time at schools learning new things every day. Good manners and discipline are fostered in the minds of every individual. Nevertheless, how can a kid become the future of a nation without the constant care and motivation by the elders?
However, there is a possibility to get influenced by peer group including fellow students or co-workers in a wrong way since age related problems creep up during the adolescent stage. Therefore, grown – ups play a significant role in the upbringing of every person in this world as they teach moral and ethical values useful for the future.
hence, to conclude, I sum up the fact that even though people learn many things from the influence of fellow students or co-workers and teachers or supervisors, it is the elders who play a major role in every person’s life in a more positive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
... that they may take of their offspring. children, right from a young age imitate the dee...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
... thus being greatly influenced by them. even after attaining maturity, they tend to ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...eir parents rather than the peer group. hence, I strongly agree to the fact that peop...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 105, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...including fellow students or co-workers in a wrong way since age related problems creep up dur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ical values useful for the future. hence, to conclude, I sum up the fact that ev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01851851852 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71541097997 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614197530864 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5136760111 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272054877183 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779870360506 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130661598826 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135076267944 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949892937622 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.