Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads . To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Developing and maintaining infrastructure is one of government tasks, by using taxpayer’s money to invest and build more roads or railways. There is opinion that country budget should be more focus on roads than railways. I agree with this statement because railway technology and trains itself are more environmental friendly than automobiles.
Nowadays, trains technology is already very developed. Compared to cars it more faster and caused less carbon emission since it only use electricity as main source of operating. For example, in 1960s Japan already have bullet-train systems through out the country with the speed of more than 200 kph and it showed economic benefits and also benefits to the people. Goods are being transport faster and people now can go to work in big cities like Tokyo or Osaka for a very short time.
As a matter of fact. There are many scientific researches carried out that emissions from diesel-engines is one of main caused of climate change and it still take a lot times to develop till fully electronic car can be use. Opposite to that, train-engines are already use electricity and at the same time can carry a lot of passengers and prevent the use of thousand of internal combustion engines, reducing carbon footprint. Most of developed countries around the world are already have or investing in railway systems, Europe and Japan have the most electrified rails in the world. The US and China are after the same trend because they see beneficial of having a good transport system.
In conclusion, the State should divert more fund into rail lines as this will shorter travel times and prevent climate change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...ady very developed. Compared to cars it more faster and caused less carbon emission since i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... main source of operating. For example, in 1960s Japan already have bullet-train systems...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...Japan already have bullet-train systems through out the country with the speed of more than...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...kyo or Osaka for a very short time. As a matter of fact. There are many scient...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...n caused of climate change and it still take a lot times to develop till fully elect...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07664233577 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77818743612 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1064000203 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127164956769 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477734626025 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071018433332 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926078643658 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102052976036 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.