Governments should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
It is argued that government should allocate bigger funds on railways as compared to roads. I strongly agree with this statement because trains are faster and they are environmentally friendly.
The first reason why states should focus more on developing and improving rail lines is that they offer a shorter duration of time travel. This is to say that their average speed is faster as compared to buses or cars. Travelling by trains is an effort and time saving because they do not encounter traffic jams along the way and that is why people prefer this mode of transportation. Through technology, trains are more sophisticated nowadays because they are designed accordingly based on how fast they are. For example, in the Philippines, it takes an hour to travel by taxi from Sampaloc to Pasay whereas by train it will only take 20 minutes.
Another reason why trains should receive more funding from the government is that they do not harm the earth. Trains are functioning without the use of fossil fuels and as a result, they do not emit carbon dioxide, which is a greenhouse gas that contributes to the rising global temperature. If there are more efficient trains available it could also reduce the number of vehicles on roads because people will likely use this type of transport. For instance in Germany, when their government spent billions of dollars on electric trains there was a significant decrease in car ownership as well as a reduction in the ppm levels of CO2.
In conclusion, the reasons why I support the idea that states should invest more on trains are: they provide a shorter span of time travel and help reduce the increasing amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... say that their average speed is faster as compared to buses or cars. Travelling b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92387543253 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68950521415 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2571594737 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130623487054 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602787060822 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062340538533 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109177449435 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10062723441 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.