High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions?
It is true that many students at high school lack skills in managing their own finance. This happens because of some reasons, and effective solutions should be proposed to deal with the problem.
To begin with, there are several grounds why high school students are not good at managing money. The first reason is that the curriculums at many schools do not contain subjects teaching students how to save and spend their money wisely. Pursuing an extra course outside school might also be unfeasible because students are so caught up in the pressure of learning academic subjects at school that they do not have the time to learn this course. The second reason stems from parents who provide their children with sufficient money just to make sure that their children focus mainly on academic study without worrying much about money. As a result, children feel that learning to manage money is unnecessary.
Several measures should be implemented to solve this issue. First, the authorities should supplement the subject on life management into the syllabus, which will help students to be able to manage the cash flows of their budgets. Second, parents need to bring up their children to make most of their pocket money. This can be done by limiting the number of money children have to spend within a month, which would encourage patterns of behavior in which youngsters learn to use money wisely and not to squander their savings in order to keep up with their peers in school.
In conclusion, the shortage of skills in managing money amongst high school students is caused by several factors, and the school's authorities and parents need to come up with solutions to this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96126760563 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3862408736 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7366157335 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291632365948 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132588905752 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104240417737 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206510381653 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729202724781 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.