The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?"
It is widely argued that the rise of production of consumer goods leading to the natural environment is destroyed. This essay will discuss the reason and give some solutions to deal with this practice.
To begin with, there are many reasons why I suppose that the increase in the production of consumer goods damages the environment. First and foremost, the more goods are produced, the more rubbish is released to the environment. Indeed, most consumer products are packed with plastic bags or boxes, which are non-biodegradable. After using products, people throw packing bags directly into the surroundings, turning our planet into a huge landfill with an awful lot of garbage, which seriously contaminates the soil and water environment. As a result, both marine and terrestrial animals are under the threat of losing living habitats even if they can be killed by eating plastic things. Another reason is that enterprises give off poisonous substances to the atmosphere during the manufacturing process. This is also the cause of many diseases related to respiratory and even cancer.
It raises a question of what are possible ways to resolve this problem. The answer can probably be found from the large utilization of materials that are not environmentally friendly. People must use eco-friendly ingredients, which can be disintegrated such as paper or bamboo, in the production lines. In addition, the enterprises should add a purified system with the aim of cleansing the emission before releasing it to nature. Last but not least, governments and authorities should promulgate policies about the waste disposal and pose a heavy fine on factories not following the policies.
In conclusion, it may not be possible to completely eliminate all the risks of the problem. Nevertheless, if these measures are put into practice, people will solve the damage of the increase in consumer products to the natural environment and nature will also become cleaner.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30031948882 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99709801902 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591054313099 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1582342826 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354195787457 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949934642564 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788170997139 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199479456291 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398668571158 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.