Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is true that the popularity of cars in recent years has had detrimental impacts on traffic and the environment. While it is argued by some people that the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems is raising petrol’s price, I believe that other measures are more effective and should be taken into consideration.
Albeit higher cost could make people more aware of their fuel use, it does not mean that they would completely cut it off. Since petrol is one of life’s necessities, everyone would continue paying for it to meet their needs. Motorbikes and cars would not be bought and then abandoned just because of the cost’s increase. In addition, the economy is really sensitive to swings around the world, which could lead to the unreasonably high price of commodities. This might result in a decline in national and international trade or recessions in many countries.
Taking all the above reasons into account, some better measures could be carried out to crack those alarming problems of traffic and environment. The first solution is taking advantage of renewable energies such as solar, wind, or water to step-by-step ratchet down exhaust emissions. For instance, well-known automotive manufacturers like Tesla or BMW have introduced some car models powered by electricity and received rave reviews from both authorities and residents. Another promising strategy is providing efficient public transport like bullet trains worldwide. Due to the conveyance’s high speed and punctuation, people could use it as a replacement for private cars or motorcycles, which are needed for safe-travelling and time-saving.
To conclude, inflating petrol price is not an effective measure to alleviate the problems of growing traffic and contamination; hence, other methods should be adopted instead for long term efficacy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, really, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48096885813 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07789308537 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9800245981 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157270620678 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507172889659 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802643163236 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122276011487 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906787741147 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.