Along with the development of modern world, cars are becoming a not replaceable mean of transporting. However, the pollution problems come with the vehicles are influencing our air quality as well. The public argued that raising the price of petrol to reduce the frequency people drive cars would be a perfect solution; whereas, I do not completely agree with this argument.
Admittedly, the soaring price of petrol would stop people from driving cars, but it is not a fundamental solution and people may set up a striking group to protest the outrage price. People nowadays often do not work or study near where they live and it often needs to take at least two hours of driving to reach their destination. Furthermore, some shopping malls are located in the remote area in order to lower the cost of operational expenses such as rent. In this case, driving has becoming a mean of crucial importance to have more motility. Nevertheless, the exhaust produced by vehicles within this procedure cannot be neglected.
To solve pollution problems effectively and avoid irritating people, one of the best ways is to invest in electric vehicles. Governments could cooperate with cars manufactures by reducing the price of them to speed up the widespread of this kind of cars. Cutting the actual usage of petrol is a better way than controlling the price irrationally. Another way which can only mitigate pollution problems slightly would be constructing a well-designed transport system. By connecting faraway places with transportation, the number of cars can be reduced effectively because a large number of people used to drive are taking buses or subways together. Take my hometown Taipei for example, commuters can reach any corner they want by taking buses and subways. It not only helps to save the cost of commuting, but also improves air quality in city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cars can be reduced effectively because a large number of people used to drive are taking buses o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, at least, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07817589577 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84642845159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3095915449 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140689125326 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446872063914 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469921724714 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939758025113 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249013479045 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.