With the advancement of transportation system, especially air travel, people can now go to another countries for business, educational and medical purposes. Many countries open their door to attract more tourism by making international travel more cheaper. I will discuss both boon and bane of tourism in the subsequent paragraph.
There are multifarious pros of tourism. To begin with, people like to go a country where medical treatment is better than his own country. For instance, a large number of people visit developed countries in each and every year for better medical facilities and this is a positive development that ensure healthcare for many human beings.
Moreover, mostly businessmen executives are
set up their own business branches in another nations. As a result, it creates the better relationship among states to reduce the gap between developed and developing countries. In addition, with the help of globalization, more working opportunities are available for individuals which are very useful for diminishing the unemployment rate and poverty in the country.
Furthermore, by increasing international tourism industry, people can get the chance to know about the foreign culture and it is very important to maintain the world peace environment. Last but not least, tourism income may help to conserve the natural landscape, wildlife and cultural heritage. Without financial support, the scenic spot will be disrupted and faded away.
On the other hand, air travel plays an important role but the negative side of tourism can not be neglected. Firstly, tourists do not follow the rules of another nations and throw the garbage on roads which increases the many environmental problems. Secondly, educational and medical sector are also neglected by government by doing more investment on historical places to attract more tourists in their own country.
To sum up, many countries are rely on tourism industry. Meanwhile, though the pros clearly outweigh the cons. The limitations of tourism should be handled by taking efforts by government and individuals mutually. By doing so, tourism would be developing in an healthier way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
... tourism by making international travel more cheaper. I will discuss both boon and bane of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ter than his own country. For instance, a large number of people visit developed countries in eac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tourism income may help to conserve the natural landscape, wildlife and cultural...
^^
Line 12, column 31, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...untry. To sum up, many countries are rely on tourism industry. Meanwhile, though ...
^^^^
Line 12, column 258, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...oing so, tourism would be developing in an healthier way.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47164179104 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97491405104 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2245182575 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4736842105 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291516040638 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834848833249 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129373984084 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125977386827 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117616925786 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.