International travel is becoming cheaper, many countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages?
Nowadays, many people claim that international travel has gained popularity and this leads to an increase in tourists. There are many negative aspects of this trend, although there are compelling reasons as to why this decision is overall a desirable trend.
On the one hand, the increase in international tourism can be disadvantageous in many ways. The main shortcoming is this increases the amount of greenhouse gas emissions. This is caused by the emissions including NO2, SO2, CH4, and CO2 is produced from transport activities such as car, plane, and ship. Besides, the number of international tourists too high can outstrip the capacity of transport systems. According to research from socialists, this is why the figure for transport congestion increases by 10 % in Ho Chi Minh city.
On the other hand, it seems to me that governments should encourage citizens to travel overseas because of some undeniable benefits. Firstly, it is an apparent fact that the growth of tourism plays an important role in developing national finance. This stems from the increase in related business activities such as food, hotel, and transport. According to the statistic from economists, the national budget will jump by 20 % if the number of tourists increases by 10 %. From cultural perspectives, another advantage could be that this provides for people with several opportunities to expose many various cultures and lifestyles. As a result, people not only broaden their knowledge and horizon but also create many new relationships.
In conclusion, there are some minus points for the increase in overseas tourists, although I am of the opinion that its advantages of this trend would be more important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, as to, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28044280443 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99070834515 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5594863006 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194726772166 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675958356806 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571295993758 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120123724633 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171405951414 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.