It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the relative importance of natural talent and training is a frequent and popular topic of debates, where people discuss the various levels of abilities in sport, art, or music.
It is obvious, that education systems are based on belief than children can effectively be taught to acquire different skills, including those associated with sport, art, and music. So from our own school experience, we can find plenty evidence to support this thought, that any children can acquire these skills with continued training and practice.
However, some people believe that innate talent is more essential factor that continued teaching. They think, that this differentiates talented people from those who has been trained to play sport or an instrument. In other words, there is more skill than a teaching technique, and this extra talent can not be taught, no matter how good the teacher an practices.
My opinion is that some people have talents that are undoubtedly inherited via their genes. Such talent give individuals a facility for certain skills that allow them to excel, whereas others are more hard-working students, nevertheless they never manage to reach a comparable level. But, as with all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not mutually exclusive. Good musicians or artist have probably succeed because of both good training and innate talent. Without the natural talent, continuous training would be neither attractive nor productive, and without the training, people cannot improve and develop their talent.
In conclusion, I agree that any child can be taught particular skills, but to be a be a real professional and good in areas such as music, art, or sport, then some natural talent is required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that this differentiates talented people from those who has been trained to play ...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... taught, no matter how good the teacher an practices. My opinion is that some p...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an practice' or simply 'practices'?
Suggestion: an practice; practices
... taught, no matter how good the teacher an practices. My opinion is that some people have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
... Good musicians or artist have probably succeed because of both good training and innat...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'be a'.
Suggestion: be a
...can be taught particular skills, but to be a be a real professional and good in areas suc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... be taught particular skills, but to be a be a real professional and good in areas s...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230283911672 0.247107183377 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.15141955836 0.155533422707 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.116719242902 0.0946595960268 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0473186119874 0.0501214627716 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0347003154574 0.0437548338989 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0977917981073 0.122226691241 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0347003154574 0.0403226058552 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6554303712 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.018927444795 0.0326793684256 58% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0851735015773 0.0861772015684 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0220820189274 0.021408717616 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018927444795 0.011925033212 159% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1739.0 1933.35771543 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 316.048096192 88% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27797833935 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.447653429603 0.374742101984 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306859205776 0.28420135186 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198555956679 0.203846283523 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129963898917 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6554303712 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.037074148 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.56093040696 109% => OK
Word variations: 67.5586138167 60.7387585426 111% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0833333333 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.027345217 49.517814964 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.916666667 127.492653851 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.814263465372 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.99599198397 150% => OK
Readability: 53.769253911 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.55405405405 1.69124875643 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400239264214 0.332605444948 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0927354568734 0.102741220458 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0486245268099 0.0668466124924 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589492778236 0.534860350844 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.221144176283 0.148594505496 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151078826545 0.134430193775 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649986149536 0.0742795772207 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.183757349955 0.324371583561 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0557618141481 0.0638462369009 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222758313113 0.228012699653 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512643051319 0.058150111329 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.