It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argued that it is more reasonable for children to focus on gaining knowledge about the history of their owned country rather than that of the other countries. While I accept that national history is important, I believe that world history also a valuable documents that children should be encouraged to learn.
It is undeniable that schoolchildren should learn about local history as a compulsory subject. (1) Firstly, since each country have a long established and developed history, studying local history allows children aware of the remarkable events of the nation in the past and foster a sense of belonging. For instance, over 4000 years of history, Vietnam experienced many intense wars and difficulties to have dependence, knowing those histories make young generations proud of their ancients and appreciate more the value of life and liberty that they enjoy today. (2)Furthermore, through the history lessons, students can get deeply understanding about the core cultural and traditional values of the motherland, and have motivation to carry on the best mental assets for the next generation.
On the other side, the necessary of understanding the world history should not be underestimated. It is true that the local history have closed link to the world history and the customs of a country in some cases affected by the other country. Vietnam for instance, suffered 1000 years being dominated by China, the Vietnamese customs have roughly impacted by the Chinese traditions. Additionally, the modern globalization society requires young people to be armed with the principle knowledge about the different ethnic groups and traditions around the world. This broader perspective allows youngsters to form confidence in the international environment.
In conclusion, the national history is crucial for youngster to learn but it is by no means that the world history knowledge is out of consideration. They are both equally important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40196078431 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9977012139 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8393661244 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.153846154 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281382988556 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101633992287 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712959402451 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178523602776 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336956555408 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.