It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development?
In recent decades, there has been a growing trend towards traveling to remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend might be of great concern to some environmental activists, scientists and thrill-seekers should still be encouraged to study and explore there.
Scientists in different branches need to travel to remote natural environments like the South Pole to study and protect them. This benefits not only those who do the research themselves but also society as a whole as there will be solutions to many global problems such as climate change. Second, most scientists travel to remote natural areas in an effort to learn how to protect them from other humans. In fact, if no pertinent data about the interaction of humans and the environment is collected for research and made known to the public, even innocent people can inadvertently damage the areas.
There are also a number of benefits for tourists traveling to isolated natural environments. One of those benefits is that natural areas offer a one-of-a-kind traveling experience to visitors. For example, those who decide to take a vacation to the South Pole will be able to immerse themselves in the wilderness and the atmosphere that is entirely different from the world they know. In addition, by staying inside a natural environment, tourists will be able to develop a higher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of tourists and students have chosen to become environmental advocates or even activists after a trip to the wilderness, which helps raise public awareness on the issue.
In conclusion, traveling to remotes natural areas benefits students, scientists, and the world at large in a variety of ways. As long as there is no disruption to the original state of nature, everyone should be welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...igher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of tourists and students have chosen to be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s raise public awareness on the issue. In conclusion, traveling to remotes natura...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, still, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11824324324 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90860720813 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4245186946 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.538461538 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29194504333 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104144252246 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706466420361 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161709733293 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655879510402 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.