Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Technology seem to be a useful book supplying almost knowledge all over the world is updated every day. However, this invention, is unable to replace traditional library function because of a dozen of troubles that we could get during applying the new systems. In my opinion, using computer technology is a brilliant idea but it would be better when we combine it with traditional library system.
A model of a library equipped with full of technological devices could benefit people in saving time and space, but this idea was exaggerated its functions to hide the dark sides behind. A highlight trouble is how to maintain the stable of the network system of all computer in the library because the only one tiny mistake could block the whole library’s system. Therefore, the manager needs to update the system constantly; besides, the user also needs more time to use, control computer’s channel. In spite of the time needed, electric library would aggravate emergency problems. For example, the replacement of literary reading culture to technological book, which is appreciated of saving time, in fact, motivating the ageing brain process. Scientists proved that children, who use electronic devices without control are easily autistic or depressed because they have less time for outdoor activities. Every invention target to optimize human life, unfortunately, it seems to be harmful to people.
In this light, though maintaining public libraries is a waste of money, it is really a more feasible solution. For instance, to note daily facts, our ancestors changed carving on stone to using wood, bamboo and paper that paper material and long-lasting ink are proofs showing the ancient civilization before collapsing, it was incredibly outstanding flourish. The end of an epoch was not a full stop for everything; because book was one of precious evidences reflecting the bold sign of an epoch in itself, said scientists. Furthermore, physical books could bring knowledge to the poor, the people lacking network, so that the rapid development of digital books is synonymous with decreasing the learning opportunity of lots of people. These functions are the strength point of a real book that we could not use an electric book instead. Instead of using computer entirely for libraries, it could be benefit human more for supporting searching and storing. We could utilize but not abuse the technology.
In conclusion, the progressive spirit is positive; however it is the same of a Sine Wave, the more successes we harvest, the more failures we experience. It is impossible to avoid all defeats; however, human could control and limit these troubles. Integrating computer technology to traditional library is a brilliant idea because of decreasing the risks of health and money; furthermore, reading culture would be conserve.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2398.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 453.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.293598234 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92083930289 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545253863135 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2307897457 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125347740865 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420444963731 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541674160642 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830834114764 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185122706068 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.