In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that a few working people can make a lucrative income in many parts of the world. While some people claim that the authority should adopt a level of salaries for the general public, I personally think the country would benefit more from this fact.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why the government should introduce a standard of salaries in society. Firstly, this would contribute positively to reducing the huge gap between the rich and the poor in the community. A small proportion of citizens with a high salary would make their families more wealthy, while others who are low-earners would find difficulty in supporting their families financially. Secondly, if a country wants to ensure the equality of income between citizens, a maximum range of salaries will be of great necessity.
On the other hand, I hold a strong belief that a country would get more benefits from the fact that some people can make a high income. One of the most convincing reasons is that the more working people earn, the more they pay for the tax system. This large amount of money would be allocated for the development of a wide range of key sectors of a country such as education and health care. Another reason is that people who are high earners would be a positive role model for younger generations. In fact, intense competitions between candidates to get well-paid jobs would act as a big motivation for the youth to try their best and pursue their goals with perseverance and hard work. As a result, this would increase the number of skilled and qualified workers for future talents of a country.
In conclusion, it seems to me that in industrialized age, the government should raise public awareness of competition in the reality by the fact that people can receive their salary based on their abilities and talents instead of setting a standard range of income for citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Shweta sahu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | kaushii | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Dolang | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 61
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hould adopt a level of salaries for the general public, I personally think the country would b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...eir families more wealthy, while others who are low-earners would find difficulty in su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81957186544 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62235937602 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5059625445 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216080104783 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830281560834 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489901605973 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143350033533 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482881429608 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.