In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that a few working people can make a lucrative income in many parts of the world. While some people claim that a country would benefit from this fact, I personally think the authority should adopt a level of salaries for citizens.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why a country would get more benefits from the fact that some people can make a high income. One of the possible reasons is that the more working people earn, the more they pay for the tax system. This large amount of money would be allocated for the development of a wide range of key sectors of a country such as education and health care. Another reason is that people who are high earners would be a positive role model for younger generations. Admittedly, intense competitions between candidates to get well-paid jobs would act as a big motivation for the youth to try their best and pursue their goals with perseverance and hard work, which could increase the number of skilled and qualified workers for future talents of a country.
On the other hand, I hold a strong belief that the government should introduce a standard of salaries in society. Firstly, this would contribute positively to reducing the huge gap between the rich and the poor in the community. In fact, a small proportion of citizens with a high salary would make their families wealthier, while low-earners would find difficulty in supporting their families financially. Secondly, if a country wants to ensure the equality of income between citizens, a maximum range of salaries will be of great necessity. This would also be a way of encouraging a sense of community due to the fact that everyone would earn a quite similar salary.
In conclusion, it seems to me that in industrialized age, the government should set a standard range of income for citizens instead of letting people receive their salary based on their abilities and talents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84498480243 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66331478196 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4385944023 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215207962548 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825951777327 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050767622824 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145815480583 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479928325477 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.