In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o

Essay topics:

In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, numerous quantity of nations have an isolated group of the population with enormous incomes, anyhow, one sector of the population argue that brings benefits for their nation, while the opposite sector reckons that it would aid more to the country if the government set a roof of salaries. I believe that setting limits on the salaries scale would bring great benefits for any nation and its population.

Firstly, people with excessive income have to pay more tax because in any country taxes have to be deducted from salaries according to the amounts of money folks are getting, for instance, in Australia, tax of 10% from salary will be deducted, that means if an employee earns $100 the government will receive $10, but if the same person earns $10.000, $1.000 from tax will be deducted from his/her salary. However, this is beneficial for the government but that does not ensure that the whole country will get that benefit.

On the other hand, if the government set a top of salaries this will bring benefits for the companies because labour pays would decrease, and it would stimulate companies to invest more in generating more employment opportunities. for example, the company Quipitos S.A. from Colombia decided in 1995 create a roof of salaries in the company, this made the company reorganise finish with the excessively high salaries and they could open a new office in 1996. Furthermore, this model generates benefits if the government set minimum salaries as a compliment.

To conclude, the high incomes in isolate sectors brings benefits to the government but it never guarantees that the population will get that aid directly, anyhow creating a roof of salaries will bring more direct benefits for people only if that is complemented with a minimum income, that will build a balance in the country.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits for any nation and its population. Firstly, people with excessive income ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...nerating more employment opportunities. for example, the company Quipitos S.A. from...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63634610297 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508250825083 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.365552773 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.625 106.682146367 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.875 20.7667163134 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15213433716 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794793468256 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0158272085001 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969743867649 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203060717445 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.