In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about how the government should control the rise of the high salaries. Although there are many advantages for paying good money, I strongly believe that there should be a limit for the maximal wages.
People who support earning huge salaries, have some reasons; firstly, getting a lot of income will motivate them to continue to work hard and upgrade themselves. They may apply to more training and get further qualifications to join prestigious companies. Secondly, they believe that getting paid huge salaries is their rights. They suffered a lot and worked hard for many days so they deserve equal rewards. For example most of the private sector companies are running by this principle, when an employee works hard, he earns more. Finally, they claim that if they earn huge salaries, they will pay more tax to the government. As a result of this, more national income will be achieved and other benefits could reach the whole community.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, there are several reasons why I believe that a certain limit should control the top salaries. Firstly, the financial gap between the rich and the poor will be widened. The rich will be richer and the poor will go deeper in poverty. People may become frustrated and demotivated to work. They may commit crimes so the crime rates will rise. Secondly, it is unfair that the majority of wealth is controlled by a small group of people, while the majority of people suffer. This may disrupt the standard of living and ruin the concept of social equality. Finally, it is illogical that certain professions earn a lot of money in a form of strange discrepancy to the performed efforts. For example, football players and movie stars earn huge amount of money after working or playing for a period of two hours. On the other side, other jobs like postmen and cashiers are getting extremely low salaries.
In conclusion, it may appear reasonable to not to restrict the increase in the top salaries, but I argue that the high salaries should be kept under certain limit that gives the hard workers their rights and also protects the poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...rked hard for many days so they deserve equal rewards. For example most of the privat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90082644628 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47225188538 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556473829201 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.810660372 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.95 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238223008763 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684806480491 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536291551524 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161684912732 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596546532275 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.