In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend.
In the modern world, family topic is a matter which has provoked a considerable debate. There is a wide belief that in many societies, residents in city areas showed their preference for living alone or in nuclear families rather than in large families. From my personal perspective, this trend has benefits and drawbacks.
On the one hand, the idea that people should live alone or in small family units is quite plausible for two reasons. One reason why people propose this is that this life style make them recieve independence and freedom. In detail, the young can choose a house or an apartment wherever they like. In addition, when they own an accommodation, they can decorate as well as buy furniture what they like. Thus, this help people feel happy and comfortable to live and work. It should be also noted that living in a family that has grandparents, parents and children, all members have to make sure benefits of other members. If everyone has different habits, it will be difficult to live together. Take an example, grandfather wants to go to bed early but the nephew goes to home late.
On the other hand, there are some reasons as to why this standpoint should be refuted. Firstly, living in a large family can help residents save money from renting house or sharing electricity and water bills. Secondly, it is logical that people can give help and care about others when living together. To illustrate, grandmother can help parents take care of their children. Furthermore, sharing house chores can make people have more time to work and relax. Finally, there is the lack of land or accommodations when more and more people live alone. This brings a huge problem for government and individuals to solve.
In conclusion, the ongoing argument have convinced me that living alone/ in small family or in large family groups brings positive and negative effects, so choosing how to live depends on people’s different need and conditions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92145015106 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63058214002 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555891238671 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9537128309 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7368421053 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351935627345 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915279950564 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960617155897 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236012538441 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889159587248 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.