Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen. This is extremely harmful to their development. Therefore, parents should strictly limit the time that children spend in this way.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent times, the younger ones have been observed to spend quality time watching Television or computer screen. Therefore, parents have been advised to strictly curb this habit. While I understand this, I would argue that it helps build children's intellect.
It is often argued that excessive television watching or the use of computers by children should be limited. Proponent of this claimed that it is harmful to their development. It is believed that these younger ones have problems getting along with their peers as they are used to keeping to themselves by watching. For instance, children found to be irritable in school or any social gathering are those addicted to watching cartoons or playing computer games. Another typical example is that their sight is usually affected because of long hours in front of the set straining their eyes. Consequently, their social life is affected leaving them hostile.
On the other hand, there are stronger reasons for arguing that children should be allowed to watch from the screen (Television and computers). Firstly, it builds them intellectually.they are exposed to different arts(comic or abstracts) that improves their qualitative reasoning. Also, instead of being involved in rough and dangerous play that can lead to domestic accidents, then, their favorite cartoons, films or games keeps them busy. This also allow their parents attend their own tasks. For example, children that watches different carton series appears to be good at telling stories in details.
All summed up, it is my view that children are allowed maximum screen time. This is because it improves their thinking abilities and also helps to while away time. Only then a proper mental development can be achieved.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30215827338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66088840526 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618705035971 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2207367473 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7058823529 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293909744193 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960165276882 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643046015158 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18675883199 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519714075453 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.