Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museum outweigh its advantage?
people have different views about whether the museum force visitors pay the entrance fee or not is a hot topic for debated. Although many people believe it is not necessary , I am convinced that museums should charge for admission.
we can't deny some small negative result if tourists have to pay some money to enter. Firstly, many visitors may feel uncomfortable if museums charge entrance fee because museums is a public services for every one who want to search the information about the history or just want to relax in the weekend. As a result, they may never comeback again and the museum become meanless if no body care about them. moreover, nowadays many museums have free opening for every one during the year in order to attract people visit. Consequence, the museums which charge admission won’t get the attention of tourist.
By contrast, there are many benefits if people pay for the entrance fee when they go to the museum. A strong argument in favour of charging visitors for entrance fee is to serve them better. In my front of view, entrance fee help museums maintain their services and make it better. Thus, we can clearly seen that if tourist pay for admission, they will get better experience whenever they come to the museums. moreover, another strong point is if every people can contribute some money for the museum it will help gorvernment manage museums budget easier. Due to that ideal, government can spend money to some others public services like education or medical … and the resident can enjoy it. Last but not least, I strongly recommend that every one should contribute for the museums because their value they bring to us and for the staffs who are always work hardly with their hearts.
In conclusion, although charging people for admission have some small demertits, the advantages of this solution completely outweigh the disadvantages. I strong argue that, we should contribute money for the museums to make it better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people have different views about whether the ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... many people believe it is not necessary , I am convinced that museums should char...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...museums should charge for admission. we cant deny some small negative result if...
^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eums should charge for admission. we cant deny some small negative result if tour...
^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...again and the museum become meanless if no body care about them. moreover, nowadays man...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...me meanless if no body care about them. moreover, nowadays many museums have free openin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ence whenever they come to the museums. moreover, another strong point is if every peopl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 854, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: hardly work
...to us and for the staffs who are always work hardly with their hearts. In conclusion, al...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96072507553 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50017418467 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.012950096 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382274702246 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13836250319 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835943783254 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268817835131 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395623458438 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.