Many people think that zoos are cruel. Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is thought by some that zoos should not be allowed to operate because of their cruelty. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that these places play an integral role in wildlife conservation.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why zoos are criticized for their cruelty. For one, zoos cannot provide enough space for captive animals, especially for those that roam over large distances, such as panthers or swallows. This could make the animals feel like they are being kept in prison, which can lead to distress and attempt to commit suicide. In addition, animals may lose their natural behavior like hunting skills, nurturing skills for offspring because they do not have the ideal conditions to hone them. Therefore, they are likely to face survival threats when released since they lack the skills needed to feed themselves or to deal with predators.
On the other hand, I would maintain that zoos are necessary for animals’ protection. It must first be recognized that zoos provide a safe living environment for animals, including food and healthcare. These animals are protected from poachers, natural disasters, and diseases and are supported by breeding programs. In fact, some animals that are not strong enough to survive on their own in nature, such as black rhinos, rely on zoos for their survival. Another benefit of zoos is that they educate the public about conservation issues. When tourists visit zoos, they can learn more about the animals’ world, thus raising their awareness about protecting these species, especially the endangered ones. For example, as a media program about updating penguins’ life has been launched in an Australian zoo, a fund for conserving marine species has been created and got an enormous donation, which is used to clean the beach and for other environmental protection purposes.
In conclusion, while it is true that zoos can be detrimental to the development of natural wildlife animals, it is my belief that the existence of these institutions is important for their long- term protection.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19578313253 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69084153665 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2777176181 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134035591733 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528365566097 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296939181571 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702097990608 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515483126653 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.