Many people think that zoos are cruel. Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
According to a part of crowd zoos are not the good place to keep the animals, as they are more brutal towards them. However, other part of crowd accord that zoos are working fantastically for the protection of endangered animals. I support the former view as I also believe that zoos are working in favor of the animals.
To commence with, on one hand, there are some downsides of zoos which make people think negative about them. The first one is that it is hurtful for animals that they have to live in a small place and they cannot roam arround in the zoo according to their own choice. Moreover, animals may lose their natural behavior like hunting skills, nurturing skills for offspring because they do not have the ideal conditions to hone them. In addition, sometimes some animals like monkeys have to show some acts in front of people visiting the zoo and if they do not perform well in that case their keeper also punish them. Hence, these are some pitfall of zoos which make it a jail for animals to live in.
On the other hand, some people believes that zoos are not only working exceptionally in the protection of rare animals, but also providing safe environment to live along with sufficient food and healthcare to numerous animals. For instance, bangal tigers were about to get extinct, but many zoos worked together and kept them in zoo to provide favourable environment to them, as a result by 2018 number of them had been increased. Another benefit of zoos is that they educate the public about conservation of endangered species of animals. When tourists visit zoos, they can learn more about the animal's world, thus raising their awareness about protecting animals and stop hunting them. Therefore, undoubtedly, zoos are working really well for the protection of animals.
In summary, I believe, although there are some downfalls of zoos, the way they are working for the conservation of wildlife is phenomenal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-27 | Navneet bal | 71 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | Navneet bal | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | hoakim | 89 | view |
- The graphs show the cost of watching movies and change in market share of three different way of watching movie 89
- Modern appliances in the home have become more common leaving no doubt that advances in technology have improved our lifestyle To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 73
- The line graph shows subscription of 3 g mobile service among males and females in a city in USA from 2003 to 2011 20
- The chart show information about the kilometers traveled in an average month and distribution of vehicle types in Britain 73
- The chart show information about the number of kilometers traveled in an average month and the distribution of vehicle types in Britain 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
According to a part of crowd zoos are not the good plac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88519637462 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56821751129 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501510574018 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7245609548 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211912636722 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849988971645 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356665777222 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116684321057 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05631921236 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.