Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
Students often have two main options of accommodation when they study at a university: living with their families or living away from families due to long distance to schools. The two options have its own benefits and drawbacks.
When shifting study environment, staying with families has some obvious benefits. First, students who stay with their families tend to not be anxious about living costs, therefore they can only focus on their study. According to a report of a study published in ABC magazine, a significant proportion of students living with their families or relatives during the period of their studying obtain outstanding grades. Second, living a same house with other family members help students release their stress in life. In case of failing a subject, for instance, students can talk to their parents and receive advice directly and immediately. Apparently, these are motivating forces to help them feel much better. However, there are some drawbacks, such as students who live with their families are likely to not have some essential skills for their independent life. Many students don’t know how to manage money or do housework because their parents or relatives care these for them. Consequently, they would have many difficulties when live independently.
On the other hand, students who have to live far away from their families tend to be more self-reliant in thinking and making a decision. They resort to learning a lot of skills such as social skills, budget management skills, and decision making skills to adapt to new life without their parents’ guidance. The fact that more than 50% of successful businessmen don’t live with their parents during their study shows that an independent life help students more mature. In contrast, starting a new life of study without parents’ observation might cause some negative consequences. Beginning a new life far away from families can put students at greater risk of offending. For example, some thieves arrested by police officers who are college students admits that they don’t have enough money to make ends meet that why they steal from other people.
In conclusion, the concentration on study and to be shared thoughts are the main advantages of living with families when students study at universities, but it also have disadvantages such as the lack of some essential skills for life. Similarly, a life without parents nearby has its own benefits and drawbacks such as mature in thinking and risks of crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: helping
...Apparently, these are motivating forces to help them feel much better. However, there a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ome thieves arrested by police officers who are college students admits that they don&a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ents study at universities, but it also have disadvantages such as the lack of some ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22716049383 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78114363979 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3975933562 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.421052632 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284588034868 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1056642468 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786975736644 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18339653896 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692912277227 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.