Many university students live with their families, while other live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations?

Essay topics:

Many university students live with their families, while other live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations?

With the increasing number of people attending higher levels of education, whether living at home or mitigating to other cities is a controversial topic in today modern’s world. In my point of view, while I assume that both of these situations contain advantages and disadvantages, I would claim that living far from home has much more benefits than the rest.

On the one hand, the youngsters living with their families have many advanced benefits. They don’t have to worry about the financial problems because these undergraduates get their parents’ financial support to cover their tuition and live rent-free at their own houses. Moreover, living with parents could bring college students more leisure time to study instead of doing household chores. However, living in the cocoon of caring families also deters the young from growing up and being independent. The university students living at home usually rely on their parents’ help and money more than these living far from home. As a result, these students will have a high barrier of earning themselves living skills such as cooking, washing clothes. And they usually don’t have the intention of working to pay their own educational fee which lead to lack of working experiment.

On the other hand, living far away from home also contains both beneficial sides and shortcomings. To talk about the advantages of living in a different place to learn university, we have to concur that the undergraduate who have to acclimatize to new environments will have better living skills and more flexible solutions to tackle new problem popping up every day. Consequently, those living far from home could have many opportunities to be more mature and dependent. Nevertheless, it can’t be denied that living far from home could also have some drawbacks. First of all, these undergraduate could have gone through homesick and when they got hard time at school there was barely anyone to encourage and support them emotionally. Secondly, living in a new environment could make some students struggling to find new friends and distinguish the frauds to protect themselves.

To conclude, living with families when attending university is beneficial in a few aspects. However, I am firmly of the opinion that studying and living far away from home has more significant advantages that outweigh the drawbacks. Because of that, I highly recommend that people should encourage themselves or their children to study universities that far from their hometown to explore the world and learn new knowledge.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has much more benefits than the rest. On the one hand, the youngsters living w...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch lead to lack of working experiment. On the other hand, living far away from ...
^^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this undergraduate' or 'these undergraduates'?
Suggestion: this undergraduate; these undergraduates
...also have some drawbacks. First of all, these undergraduate could have gone through homesick and wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uish the frauds to protect themselves. To conclude, living with families when a...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30731707317 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88055802149 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.089050948 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398388775333 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138234047073 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727069050894 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257102739053 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053969383 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.