More and more people now own cars. What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars? How can these problems be solved?
It goes without saying that people's demand for having a private car in modern society is increasing as a result of the predominant growth of industry and technology. Consequently, this trend leads to some undoubtedly negative effects challenging our society. This essay will discuss those problems and propose some possible solutions to them.
Due to the rise in the number of private cars, social problems are bound to crop up. The main issue is environmental degradation. Since there are more and more cars on the streets and roads, there is a higher possibility of causing traffic congestion, which results in pollution, including air pollution and noise pollution. An additional problem is the rising price of petrol and diesel oil. Behind this problem lies the reason that it is associated with the fuel need for vehicles. Further pressures will include the decline in human health. Clearly, the pollution caused by this trend leads to detrimental impacts on people's health, especially the respiratory and nervous systems. However, they also see this as a problem because their preference for the use of private cars even for short distances significantly reduces the time they walk every day. It will have adverse impacts on their fitness.
The problems of this trend can be reduced by using several strategies. The first thing to do is to enhance the overall quality and reliability of public transport. It is advisable because it ensures people's belief in them and gradually reduces the growth of own car mobility. Another sensible solution is to impose higher taxes on petrol and car sale. This will make car owners feel discouraged, and fewer people have any intention of owning a car. Finally, it is recommendable that carpooling (also called car-sharing) be applied broadly. It is briefly understood as “the sharing of car journeys so that more than one person travels in a car”. This is a quite efficient way to solve the problem of having more private cars since it is significantly correlated with transport operating costs and measures of social capital, such as time spent with others, eating and drinking, etc. In fact, this solution has been applied in many countries such as England, Singapore, etc., and it is popular for people who live in places with high residential densities.
In conclusion, although the problem of the increasing number of private cars may seem impossible to eliminate, there are concrete steps that can be taken to tackle it. By taking these steps, we can make our society turn out a better, happier and more convenient place to live in.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ciated with the fuel need for vehicles. Further pressures will include the decline in h...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...en to tackle it. By taking these steps. we can make our society turn out a better,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06088992974 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73028947854 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564402810304 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7622100464 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0416666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401418195545 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946389689866 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689310638147 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231325151268 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767027302215 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ciated with the fuel need for vehicles. Further pressures will include the decline in h...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...en to tackle it. By taking these steps. we can make our society turn out a better,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06088992974 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73028947854 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564402810304 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7622100464 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0416666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401418195545 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946389689866 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689310638147 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231325151268 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767027302215 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.