More and more people now own cars. What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars? How can these problems be solved?
In this day and age, cars have increasingly been viewed as a symbol of proper, richness and nobility partly due to their expensiveness. However, with a steadily increasing number of population all over the world, the tendency of owing private cars as one of each person’s life goals has actually caused severe issues to the whole society. In this essay, issues that this tendency generate and its solutions will be discussed thoroughly.
It can be indisputable that environmental pollution, when much more cars come into use, can be the most worrying problem. Particularly, the more cars run on the road, the more densely the emissions from them cover the sky. As it is stated by meteorologists, greenhouse effect caused by the emissions including CO2, SO2…will lead to a surge of the atmosphere’s temperature and also, more acidic rains in some highly-industrialized regions.
In addition, one of the most identifiable phenomena in overpopulated cities is traffic congestion caused by the daily gathering of cars on many hot spots. It can be understandable that the rich who are living primarily in the city centers always have the attitude of owing luxury cars for their convenience and comfort. As a result, the high accumulation of cars from low to high-quality in the city centers is a matter of time. In some worst-case scenarios, cars can get the whole traffic system stuck over many hours.
Although the high demand for cars can help to create a sustainable market of jobs for the jobless and the unskilled workers, constructing a host of parking spots have also sparked much more never-ending debates between the authorities of big cities. It stands to reason that the source of money spent for building parking spaces account for a high fraction of government budget. That will influence considerably on the extensive development of every potential region’s economy in many countries.
To overcome those severe outcomes, there have existed many detailed solutions for many years. Firstly, local leaders should impose the policy of using public transports in the rush hour. More than that, developing the infrastructure of residential areas that are far from the city centers can contribute to the reasonable dispersion of inhabitants. Also, updating the state-of-the-art model of public transport should be paid attention to make people save more time from home to work or vice versa.
To sum up, the rapid increase in the number of cars has actually deformed the stable infrastructure of cities and influenced severely on the quality of their inhabitants’ life. Therefore, the authorities of local areas should consider more and more urgent solutions as soon as possible to prevent unexpected outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | namanpluck | 79 | view |
| 2020-11-28 | chirox.ame | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-23 | LE ANH HUY | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-02 | Jiny Ju | 78 | view |
| 2017-07-12 | chan chan | 56 | view |
- Beside a lot of advantages some people believe that the Internet creates more problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones has negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 73
- Some people think children s spending time on TV video and PC games is good while others think it is bad Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Beside a lot of advantages some people believe that the Internet creates many problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent Why do you think this is and what can be done about it 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23515981735 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10695699227 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554794520548 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.350155446 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.684210526 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269471807448 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774761046681 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677777289851 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134208112631 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065606545793 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.