News stories on Tv and in Newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
One of the foremost goals of news agents and broadcasting channels on TV and newspapers’ journalists is to grab more and more public attention. To catch this aim, they apply a rich variety of strategies, one of the most influential of which is adding visual items to their reports. Personally, I concur with the effectiveness of this technique due to a variety of reasons such as attractiveness and effectiveness of pictures over words.
Firstly, regarding news coverage on TV, accompanying visual sections with the story being told as well as playing the voices or sounds from a scene of an event can result in an increased influence of that piece of news. For example, showing bloodshed or corpses during a war report can be taken as a notable instance of the above-mentioned effects. Predictably, the viewers of these scenes get tremendously influenced, and this great influence can lead to immense anti-war emotions throughout the world.
Secondly, considering newspapers, as one of the most popular media, having various sorts of reports plus pertinent pictures may contribute to its level of attractiveness. To illustrate, it seems obvious that photos are an integral part of paper reports since newspapers tend to be dull and boring if they contain thousands of mute words without any images. Take for example, a smoker who just has an inattentive glance on a newspaper; very probably he will not read an article with regard to deleterious consequences of smoking if there are no pictures of cigarettes or diseased lungs befriending the report; hence, these are the pictures that can make him have a more detailed look over the paper.
All in all, it is true to value pictures over words in terms of being more breath-taking and eye-catching for the broadcasting media such as TV and newspaper, owing to the huge inspiration and attraction they provide any sorts of news with.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, it is true, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06389776358 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09167465356 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610223642173 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2522652642 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.5 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189578564859 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708949874072 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512476867891 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110876230773 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437288653494 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.