Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development
Over the years the wages of celebrities are significantly higher compared to politicians. In my opinion, the development is positive and tends to have an impact on today’s society.
These days, celebrities earn more money than comparatively other occupations as they usually have a high level of creativity and talent. Moreover, they need to create performance or art which are appealing and interesting to the people which are in many forms of media for example movies, shows, music, and video games. They also need to take several risks to be successful which happens in many excellent film directors and actors where they used unpopular directing techniques and acting methods. Thus, when they become successful, numerous fans will be waiting to help and support them because of their efforts and hardworking.
Another important note, these celebrities also seem to take part or created their own charity after they earned enough wealth which ranges from donating money to tackling global issues. One of them is Angelina Jolie, who adopt orphans and poor children and other humanitarians’ activities to help to improve her nations. Politicians also do the same type of work but differ in terms of income because these people should not be money-driven. It is done to prevent them from having too much power, as some of them will become greedy and try any possible way to cheat from their people so that they could have a luxurious life and immense control which could sometimes result in that country becoming dictatorial.
In conclusion, the reason why a politician’s income is lesser than a celebrity is to prevent corruption as they affect society more and are harder to punished as they considered to have immense powers over the constitutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... immense powers over the constitutions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1637630662 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81682697344 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0049116701 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.727272727 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157264631316 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622286916879 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640846588316 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104239453896 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335712886641 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.