Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. why do you think it is happening. Is it negative or positive development?
Modern technology has brought gigantic revolution all across the world. Presently, most of the people depend on the new instruments which brought good and bad effects on our society. Here, I would like to throw light on its causes and impact on society.
To begin with specific reasons, firstly human beings lead a adequate standard of living through performing everyday activities from such advanced machines. To illustrate, using robots for daily purpose save their precious time as well as fulfill their work accurately are excellent benefits. As a result, technology has blessed with such a brilliant innovation to lead a aristocratic lifestyle. Moreover, robots are safe, effective and accessible to perform human orders .therefore, this trend of using robotics is gaining ground in this fast paced era.
There are multifarious points to shore up its shiner sides. Firstly, robotics plays a paramount role to make life easier and more convenient. To elaborate, having access to such gadgets not only offers comfortable life but also advanced lifestyle to it users. Hence, automating with such machines helps to uplift the standard of life. Furthermore, robots produce more accurate and high quality work which is more worthwhile from human workers.
On the contrary, this phenomenon has serious drawbacks. To start with, in many situations robots start to replace human beings which lead to unemployment. For example, in many factories robots are taking place of humans so the people have to find new jobs or be refrained. Finally, people can suffer from crisis in term of employment due to these advanced machines. Lastly, robots cost much money in maintenance and repair so everyone will not be able to handle the budget all time.
To recapitulate, in my opinion this trend has positive but a lot of negative effect on our society as well as on our planet. In order to live a healthy life, we need to reduce dependency on modern technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ific reasons, firstly human beings lead a adequate standard of living through per...
^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ith such a brilliant innovation to lead a aristocratic lifestyle. Moreover, robot...
^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e and accessible to perform human orders .therefore, this trend of using robotics ...
^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gaining ground in this fast paced era. There are multifarious points to shore u...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is more worthwhile from human workers. On the contrary, this phenomenon has ser...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16981132075 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73224659807 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0191454616 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5263157895 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7368421053 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7368421053 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826465888564 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221544384405 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285187009285 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424132648582 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222959834789 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.