Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economics advantage?
<span class="hiddenSuggestion" pre=""></span>The advancement of technology and the development of new environments in society easily declined the old patterns of living. The people adapt to the new lifestyle and culture to acquire new ideas and innovation for satisfactory living. The advantages of getting into these structures and throwing old things may outweigh the disadvantages.
The demerits of holding new things over old have a significant effect over citizens. The traditional form of sustaining life <span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="life "></span>is not able to survive in the next few decades and the upcoming generation does not have sufficient knowledge and information about how their ancestors have a free-living under trees and farms. people considered to go for cities and rushing their happiness into clubs and parties instead of enjoying nature and warmth of sunrise in a suburban area. They have the latest gadgets but do not have habits like reading books. Furthermore, the clothing trends drastically changed, people follow new brands and change themselves for being demanding and popular. However, the sleeping habits and working hours at late night also considered in new habits. The old rules and regulations tend to be overruled and break by youngsters today and make new laws which sometimes against the culture and tradition of the society.
In this instance, the benefits of having a novelty in life can bring some prosperity in the economy of the country. The adaption of recent trends can improve the GDP growth and competitive edge over other country's. To illustrate, the higher purchasing power of buyers and increased incomes to fulfill the requirements of lavishing life mainly contribute to the country's wealth. Moreover, the country has the power of a skilled and productive workforce when they have an adverse range of cognition. Empowerment of different sectors on different levels creates a sustainable environment for maturation.
In conclusion, I support that the gaining of new things might have so many consequences but for the necessary development of society to upgrade country, it is outweighed by the possible profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ings may outweigh the disadvantages. The demerits of holding new things over old...
^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ave a significant effect over citizens. The traditional form of sustaining life&nbs...
^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ve a free-living under trees and farms. people considered to go for cities and rushing...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considered going', 'considered gonna'.
Suggestion: considered going; considered gonna
...ee-living under trees and farms. people considered to go for cities and rushing their happiness ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67365269461 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.98413906012 2.80592935109 142% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61377245509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1499876968 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184287317339 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060280086214 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645040740865 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122071633585 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754793964994 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.