Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage?
"Modern Society will find no solution to the economical problem unless it takes a serious look at lifestyles". One the most controversial issues today leads to that, adapting throwaway society is beneficial for economy or not? In this essay; I'm going to examine this question from both point of view.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the demerits of considerably topic outweigh its merits. The main reason for believing this is that, the day to day increase demand for machinery usage. Similarly, growth in machinery leads to many negative factors which affect the environment of the economy. For example, machinery used in industries leads towards pollution, wastage of electricity and gas as well. In fact, the extra resources which are used, destroying multiple habitats. For instance; nowadays, it has become very rare when we see birds; although, in a report on birds it was shown that the rays across the earth makes migration difficult for them, they forget where they were living.
On the other hand it is also possible to make the opposite case. It is often argued that infact, advancement in technology is helping in enabling to find more cures in medical field. People often have this opinion because, nowadays; medical science has so much upgraded that they are preventing so many people from different types of diseases and problems. To illustrate, In a report that has been conducted by World Health Organisation (WHO) reveals progress among cancer patient due to advancement of technology.
I pen down saying that, there are number of answers to this question. On balance, however; I tend to believe that we can not stop the usage of new things or new technology among people but we can use beneficial methods such as RRR i.e. reduce, recycle and reuse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial issues today leads to that, adapting throwaway society is beneficial for econ...
^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...cial for economy or not? In this essay; Im going to examine this question from bot...
^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tra resources which are used, destroying multiple habitats. For instance; nowaday...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02990033223 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7224732866 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641196013289 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8857101521 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104213154709 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290806384327 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03857395565 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623867472924 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296893659754 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.