Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
These days, there is a large number of people who are inclined to squander money on food, but most of them discard the edibles afterwards. The reasons behind this trend will be outlined in this following essay, and bring out several suggestions for decreasing the thrown-away aliments.
To begin with, the tendency of wasting eatables after affording from squandering lifestyle and wealth, as life's quality of individuals has been enhanced over time. For instance, rich people tend to be deeply into enjoying luxurious, exorbitant, as well as exquisite comestibles on a regular basis. Accordingly, they would buy food randomly, which are mostly based on temporary feelings, due to the colossal amount of money and the chances of touring in different places with disparate cuisine. Moreover, this practice has a negative influence on youngsters regarding the adults' bad behaviors with food. they would not appreciate highly what provides them every day, and never respect everybody, especially homeless people and those who do not have a solid social status.
Nevertheless, there is a great number of good preventions for humans in lieu of throwing all aliments. With regard to the remaining eatables, which can not be completely consumed, individuals should feed their pets at home. For example, the fish bones, cold rice, smelly bread, dogs or cats can eat them alternatively. Additionally, in order to reduce the waste of eatables more effectively, the amount of food for daily meal need being well-considered by the buyers beforehand. They could make a list to watch for the accurate sufficiency of edibles each day, as well as enumerate what food has been left the most, then depend on it to adjust in such a way as to be diminish the thrown-away comestibles.
In summary, as the proportion of wealthy people are improving, the rate of people leaving food are also increasing. Yet, to tackle this issue, the best way is to always pay attention closely to the quantity of wasted and well-eaten food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
These days, there is a large number of people who are inclined to squander mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ggestions for decreasing the thrown-away aliments. To begin with, the tendency...
^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r decreasing the thrown-away aliments. To begin with, the tendency of wasting e...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g from squandering lifestyle and wealth, as lifes quality of individuals has been...
^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd to be deeply into enjoying luxurious, exorbitant, as well as exquisite comest...
^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly into enjoying luxurious, exorbitant, as well as exquisite comestibles on a re...
^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ing the adults bad behaviors with food. they would not appreciate highly what provid...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in summary, as well as, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85464856706 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7568318005 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304526718387 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924432156076 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053519033095 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179575894644 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416331408542 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.