Nowadays the way manypeople interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way manypeople interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?

People in every corner of the world vary from each other in terms of physical appearance, personal characteristics, and social relations as well. Nowadays, in this constantly-changing world, technology’s advancement has affected considerably on multi-aspect of people’s everyday lives, especially in the ways people build up their relationships with others. Personally, it is undeniable the influences of technology on the interaction of people positively and negatively.
First of all, nowadays, thanks to the development of science and technology, people have a lot of chances to enlarge their social cycles with everyone in every corner of the world. Indeed, no one can deny the positive influences of technology in helping people to connect to others easily, especially toward people who are far from each other. More specific, in this modern society, there are abundance kinds of smart applications which allow people keep in touch with each other, even when they are far from thousands mile to each other. Furthermore, modern technology also supports people to save a lot of money and time, and reduce relevant expenses as well as complicated procedures in talking to each other. Or in other words, it makes people can connect to each other much more easily. Take an interview as an example, in traditional ways, interviewees can waste a lot of money to prepare their documents and waste a lot of time for waiting for arragement from interviewers. And interviewers, of course, also spend a large amount of money and time for employment. And nowadays, along with technology’s support, interviewees can apply their documents online and they can be interviewed immediately through video call on electronic equipment. That’s the reasons why technology’s advancement play an indispensable role in people’s lives, by which the ways they interact with each other can be simplified significantly.
However, apart from benefits which technology brings to people’s lives, especially in the ways they connect to each other, there are several disadvantages of it. It is very easy to see that in the era of technology’s development, people have a tendency to depend on it to make friends instead of going out, greeting, shaking hands and building up relationships directly with others. In fact, lots of people prefer to make friends on the social network, especially the young generation so even though they can connect with others in all over the world but it is also pretty hard to find out true friends. Beside it, if people depend too much on modern equipment, it will become their obstacles in interaction with others when minimum conditions of technology are not satisfied. Let’s see in an interview once again, as discussed, nowadays, people prefer interviewing immediately through video call to interviewing in traditional ways, however, this conversation can be easily canceled or disrupted if the Internet connection is not very good. Also, the interviews may not know exactly interviewees’ physical outward which is one of the most important elements for employment, especially in the service industry. Conclusively, people’s interactions with others might be affected negatively if essential criteria are of technology are not satisfied.
As discussed, it is obvious that technology is a great tool to connect people, it helps people enlarge their social cycle and save more money and time in interaction with others, yet it also makes people lose lots of chances to meet and discuss with each other directly.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, apart from, in fact, of course, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 96.0 41.998997996 229% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3017.0 1615.20841683 187% => OK
No of words: 558.0 315.596192385 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40681003584 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28705737909 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464157706093 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 945.0 506.74238477 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1897092896 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.85 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313354061576 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11541305834 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707525066426 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225944251978 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363540685435 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.