While some countries peoples believe that spending large amount of money is needed to construct new railway lines for high speed trains between cities, some others suppose that money should be used to reconstruct and improving public transport. In my opinion, although construction of new railway lines is needed, it is better to improve currently established public transport.
Firstly, high speed train is dangerous for some country where technological development has not been achieved so much. For example, in Bangladesh train is least used as a medium of transport. Most of the train routes are dilapidated with old equipment including the body of train. It is almost impossible to initialize high speed trains on these routes which will cost large amount of expenditure. Besides, most of the rail lines in Bangladesh are broad gauge. So, installing meter gauge lines will be more cost consumed for high speed trains.
On the other hand, there are many places and countries where establishing railway lines are useless before improving their current transport system. For instance, a country which is surrounded by river, at first, it is necessary to build bridge over the rivers for transportation. Otherwise, the transportation vehicles on these rivers such as ferry can be increased as a better solution. In countries like India and Bangladesh traffic jam, caused by large number of cars, buses, trucks and micro-buses, is a daily problem which has to face by every people living in city. Firstly, it will be wise decision to overcome this type of problem and later think about installing new routes for train.
In conclusion, however establishing new routes for fast trains or development of current transport is depend on country, geographical location or technological improvement, initially it is crucial to improve the existing transport system then, if possible, invest money to install new railway routes for the trains which speed is high.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... or development of current transport is depend on country, geographical location or te...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes for the trains which speed is high.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29807692308 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84648408514 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7881648704 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379500594309 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124183851438 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124678984783 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258454313505 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149869276374 0.056905535591 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.