The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic has been a major concern in urban areas, where the peak hours of traffic is when people commute to their respective jobs or shopping as well as school and university students. To reduce overcrowding and minimize traffic, the need to stop these involved individuals from going to their destinations and just stay at home; which in some way can really reduce traffic is a proposed solution, but this is not the best alternative.
In case of students, yes, there are online courses that are available or tutors for pupils just to let them stay indoors, but it will still alter their growth phase like not being able to interact with kids and students; which is essential in many aspects of life. It will affect most children psychologically like being timid and unable to interact with peers in a normal manner.
On the one hand, working individuals can stay at home and get an online job, but there are different types of jobs and most jobs need face-to-face interaction. If all people will divert into online jobs, a country’s economy can get affected negatively due to the less support that is given by the people to get businesses running. Furthermore, not everyone is technologically savvy, therefore, reducing the need to commute to work is not the best option. For a business to earn a good profit, face-to-face interaction to plan things out is necessary. It is just unfathomable for most businesses to operate well using video calls. There are negative factors that can affect conversations online like the internet speed perhaps.
Therefore, the proposed solution to reduce the need to go to and from school/university, work, and shopping is not favorable since it can lead to further damage to the economy and the development phase of children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a normal manner" with adverb for "normal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...timid and unable to interact with peers in a normal manner. On the one hand, working individuals...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, really, so, still, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96296296296 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91159559839 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0664182511 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1855203452 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678909632066 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556442423508 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110602469051 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560348117199 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.