Organized tours to remote areas and community are becoming more and more popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the environment?
It has become more common for tourists to book organized trips to remote areas these days. While tourism brings a problem to the local environment, I believe that the local people will be incredibly beneficial.
To begin with, the environment of destination areas could face great damage caused by tourism. With the increasing amount of traffic, these areas will certainly suffer from severe air pollution originated by the exceeded emissions from travelers’ vehicles. For example, aboriginals living on Hoang Lien Son mountain are currently enduring extremely polluted air which has been radically caused by the raising amount of gas emitted by the tourists’ motorbikes.
Fortunately, the local people will receive great benefits and the environment issue could also be addressed effectively when the tourism industry grows. When travel agents discover a potential tourist attraction, they will come with suggestions to assist the locals in promoting their traditional businesses in order to attract travelers. Thus, more employment opportunities will be made available to the local residents and subsequently enhance their living condition by earning more money from the tourists. Moreover, after these areas become widely known by travelers, more tourists will come and the local people can have a chance to approach new lifestyles from the outside world. This allows those who never go out of such areas in their entire life to expand their knowledge absolutely free of charge. Lastly, the substantial profit gaining from travelers could also be used to hire environment experts to find solutions and ameliorate the pollution in these areas.
In conclusion, although there is a drawback when tourism reaches remote areas, I believe the merits this industry offers are far more beneficial to the locals and their environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53003533569 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85621677287 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7328047225 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255306593181 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100140960075 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809108515772 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17336918664 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845481442503 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.