In the past, cultural and historical relics were stored in museums. But now, people can see them freely with the internet. Some people believe that museums are no longer needed in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is more effortless to see the relics which stored in museums via the Internet than in the past. While a part of the function of the museum may be replaced by the Internet, I completely disagree with the idea that museums are unnecessary for our future and I believe that the advancement of technology can assist the operation of the museum.
At first, the purpose of museum establishment is to share knowledge and to provide an educational space for the masses. Although people can visit museums on the website and without charging the admission fee, others function of the museum would not be entirely substituted by the Internet. For example, the maintenance of relics is one of the irreplaceable works. There are many experts research the history of relics and develop the way which can protect the relics to keep well. Moreover, it is healthier to teach children the knowledge in the museums than surfing on the Internet, and I believe that visiting museums can improve the creativity of children.
On the other hand, the Internet still should be considered to assist museums operation, although people do not need to charged admission fee. For example, museums can create the 3D space of the indoor museum for people as like as the street view created by Google. This measure can intensify the motivation to visit museums and benefit for people who live in the countryside or foreign country. People can see more details of relics via the website and visit the website whenever they want. In addition, the Internet can assist to solve several problems such as crowded people in museums, to miss the opening hours and the impairment of relics caused by visitors.
In general, I do not agree that the development of the Internet will be the factor to cause museums valueless. Instead, it can be a powerful method to support the original purpose.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90851735016 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65180564187 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495268138801 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8189669216 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304506752356 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111082003491 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489713926833 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191444186103 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559883450352 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.